Joint Meeting of Committee for the Review of the Implementation of the Convention & the Committee on Science and Technology - UNCCD COP17

I B And Hurt Hurst.
As Is zero? I'm so sorry.
Okay.
Copy that.
Maybe the sixth image when he was pulling the covering And Thanks.
A S S.
To B.
A And Excellencies ladies and gentlemen, please take your seats.
We're about to start.
Excellency distinguished delegates.
Ladies and gentlemen, I call to order the fifth meeting of the committee for the review of the implementation of the convention and the fourth meeting of the Committee on Science and Technology.
It is my honor and pleasure to co chair with the chair of the committee for Science and Technology, this joint meeting of both committees.
Before proceeding further, I would like to remind delegation to submit their credentials as soon as possible, since the Conference of Parties will consider agenda item one D entitled Credentials of delegations at its meeting on Friday 21st of August.
Further information is available in the journal of the conference.
I invite the committees to begin their joint consideration of the agenda item entitled Improving Procedures for the communication of Information, as well as the quality and formats of reports to be submitted to the conference of the parties.
The documents before the committees are listed in today's journal and on the UNCD app.
I now give the floor to the representative of the UNCCD to introduce the documentation under this agenda.
Thank you very much.
Chairs, distinguished delegates.
By decision two and four of Cop 16, the Conference of the Parties requested the Secretariat and partners to enhance the performance review and assessment of the implementation system and continue supporting parties in strengthening their capacity to monitor the implementation of the convention and prepare for the 2026 UNCCD reporting process.
An update on progress made in this regard was presented at Creek 23 in Panama.
Double symbol document, ICCD slash CRC 24 slash four, ICCD slash cop 17 slash CSD slash provides a further update on support provided since December 2025, including through one, partnership with regional institutions, two, the delivery of regional capacity building workshops, and three, enabling activities and medium sized projects funded by the Global Environment facility.
For the 2026 reporting process, the UNCCD Secretariat has established a decentralized support model through a network of support hubs and technical advisors.
Coordinated by the Secretariat, these partners provide technical support, methodological guidance, capacity development, and context specific assistance to help countries prepare high quality and consistent national reports.
By combining global methodologies with regional expertise and national priorities, these collaborative model strengthen countries reporting capacities while promoting knowledge exchange, sound data interpretation, and the application of scientifically robust, context responsive approaches tailored to diverse national and regional circumstances.
This partner contributed to the organization of seven regional capacity building workshops, which strengthened understanding of the UNCCD reporting frameworks, enhance countries' ability to use national and global datasets, and foster peer learning.
Overall, 344 participants from 155 countries took part in these events.
These activities were made possible through financial support from the Global Environment facilities and implementation support by UNEP under the global Support Program, as well as by in kind contribution from the partners.
Jeff financing is supporting the 2026 national reporting process in more than 130 countries, including 113 countries through the UNEP implemented umbrella projects and 21 countries through a dedicated FAO pilot project, ensuring broad support for the preparation and submission of national reports.
Complementing these efforts, three GF medium sized projects are strengthening high resolution data availability, knowledge, capacity, and implementation support to advance land degradation monitoring, planning, and reporting.
The following interactive dialogue will focus on the partnerships and the support mechanisms enabling the 2026 reporting process.
It will introduce the support hubs and technical advisors, highlight the value of this model, and provide an opportunity for parties, observers, and partners to exchange lesson learned, challenges, and priorities for strengthening future reporting cycle and regional cooperation.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
I think the representative of the UN City.
We will now proceed with the panel discussion entitled Support Hubs for Reporting and Technical Advisors, Connecting Global methodologies with regional expertise.
I am pleased to welcome the representative of the Support Hubs for Reporting.
Mr.
Jang Song Lee, Global SDG 15 Coordinator, International Research Center of Big Data for Sustainable Development Goals.
Mr.
Andreas Brink, Senior Scientific and Technical Project Officer, Joint Research Center of the European Commission.
Mr.
Kenneth Casera, User Engagement and Manager, Af GO Secretariat Regional Center for Mapping of Resources for Development.
Mr.
Mustafa Mi Mouni, Director of the Technology Information and Remote Sensing Department, Sahara and Sahel Observatory, doctor Sahul Lily A Wiley, Deputy Chief Executive Officer, National Center for Vegetation Cover Development and Combating De Certification.
Miss Andswan Mile Milsap sorry, Digital Earth Pacific Program Manager, Pacific Community, and finally, Mr.
Ronan Francis, Executive Director, Partnership Initiative for Sustainable Land Management.
Before calling on the panelists, I would like to remind the panelists of the time limit of 7 minutes for presentation to allow as much time as possible for an interactive discussion.
I now give the floor to Mr.
Yong Song Li, Global SDD 15 Coordinator, International Research Center of Big Data for Sustainable Development Goals.
Thank you Chair.
It's my pleasure to introduce the Saban on how to play the role as the regional support hub for the UC national reporting.
So the Seabs is China based international agency firmly established in 2021, based in the China Academy of Sciences.
This aim to facilitate the implementation of the UN SDGs and also to support the UN global platform by using the big data.
I think this is we have international structure of the more than 200 students and 190 scientists and staff in the CAs.
We also have International Advisory Committee, the 18 leading expert from the 12 countries.
And SBA has mainly the five missions.
Firstly, we tried to develop the SDG data infrastructure and information and data products.
Also, we tried to provide the new knowledge for the SDG mounting and evaluation.
Also in the past years, we tried to launch some satellite specific to the SDG monitoring and assessment, and also we tried to establish a sync attack for the science technology innovation to promote the sustainable development goals.
The final one is the capacity development for the SDGs in the developing countries.
And as the USC the regional support hub, now the Cabs support 17 countries in the East, South and Southeast Asia, the countries very glad I could see many parties here for supporting the scope.
And the key activities in the past six months, I think the first one is the regional capacity building, the workshop in the intern from the ninth to the 12th episode in this year.
I think we worked together with the FEO together to support more than 26 countries, the parties for the training and capacity building for the national reporting.
And the second activity is the ongoing technical assistance and help desk support for the countries we support.
And the last one is we also try to develop the high quality these products and online tools for the capacity building support for the parties we support.
And in the future, I think three the main directions.
The first one is strengthened inter regional exchange to connect the global knowledge with the local context, enabling the faster the peer learning, the practical adaption and local ground implementation.
And second, we hope to adopt a multi objective approach to support coordinated action across the real conventions, the CCD, the UNFCCC, and also for the biodiversity.
To maximize the policy and implementation synergies.
And the last direction is to develop and deploy the artificial intelligence based decision supporting tools for the land ex neutralities, improving the targeting the scenario analysis, and evidence based planning at national and sub national levels.
That's all.
Thank you.
Thank you very much, Mr.
Lee.
I will now give the floor to Mr.
Andreas Brink, Senior Scientific and Technical Project Officer at the Joint Research Center of the European Commission.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Dear colleagues, it's really a pleasure to be here on the podium with my colleagues from the Support hubs to present our current experience as support hub.
As the JRC as the Joint Research Center of the European Commission, we serve as the support hub for the geographic Europe covering 44 countries.
What is the JRC? Who are we? What we do? We sit at the heart of science for policy.
So the JRC is the European Commission's in house Science and Knowledge Service.
We provide independent science for evidence making for supporting European Union policy at the European and international level.
We have a very longstanding relationship with the UN CCD.
We are one of the producers of the land productivity dynamics information layer at the global scale.
The JRC is responsible of two of the Copernicus services supporting the UN CCD.
We were one of the lead authors of the World Atlas on the certification, and we supported and contributed to the good practice guidance.
And as I mentioned, currently, we are also serving as a support hub for geographic Europe, you know, acting as technical backstopping to the country parties.
So let me come to our current experience and what we have done so far.
We have three pillars here on what we have achieved.
First one is on capacity building.
We organized a very successful in person regional workshop in Antalia and Turkey where a most of the countries attended in person and some online.
We had methodological theoretical sessions, but also a lot of hands on sessions on the use of the tools like praise for and trends.org.
Then we had several thematic webinars, including on the good practice guidance on soil organic carbon, and so on.
Next, after the workshop, we did, of course, several technical backstopping activities.
We are basically the dedicated help desk for the national teams.
We provided country specific support on understanding the default data, on analyzing how national data can be integrated into the reporting.
A lot of this happened then bilaterally in a very interactive manner.
Finally, we support, of course, also on the data, on the methods and the tools.
Since we provide one of the global key layers, we support on the method behind it.
We support on the method behind also the good practice guidance and on the soil organic carbon and on the other layers.
Any issue then which came up with the specific country party, we try to solve as smooth as possible, interacting directly also with the colleagues from ends.org and the praise for team.
Our final goal here is really to go beyond just the current activity, talking about the data and the tools and the methods, but really to build a long term community around SDG 153.1.
Since I think no country really gets there alone.
We need to come together as a scientists, as the experts, as the experts and decision makers in the field.
So summarizing our current main achievements, we had a lot of direct support to the national teams in the wider Europe, looking at the default data, how it fits to their purpose or how national data can be integrated into the reporting systems.
Any issues or bugs sometimes also with the tools were raised very efficiently with the countries and with the team of Transport Earth and Ps.
I think we started to build the first building blocks of a growing community on the practice on land integration monitoring for the reporting process in our regions.
What are the main three lessons learned so far? Of course, a joint common in person workshop is very important to have at the beginning of the process.
However, the one to one country specific dialogue is really what makes the difference then, especially when the country has national datasets which they would like to integrate into the reporting.
Global datasets are, of course, important.
They are needed, especially where national data are lacking.
However, national custom data enrich the reporting, but they require also careful methodological guidance to remain comparable in the context.
And what is important is that we remain transparent about the methodology, about the tools, about the data we use because this is the way then we build trust in the reporting.
Let me close by coming answering to the question on how integrated data ecosystems and Earth observation services help parties to improve the quality, the consistency, and the usability of national reporting.
In terms of quality, what is needed is certainly long term data, but also consistent, reliable, and validated earth observation data as those provided, for instance, by the Copernicus program, so free and open data and services, which provides some of these baseline datasets where national data are scarce.
In terms of consistency, of course, we need shared reference layers.
We need a common methodology as the one described and agreed in the good practice guidance to make results comparable across the parties and across the regions.
And finally, in terms of usability, what is critical here is that data only matters if the countries can actually use them, if they can access them, if they are easy to use.
And here, we have open data and tools such as provided to the Copernicus Daspace ecosystem, like the tools trans.org and Praise four.
And this combined with regional technical support.
This turns then the data into information, which then the countries can use.
And the last point here I would like to mention is that it's not only for the UN CCD process.
The same data ecosystem can serve actually also under the CBD, UNF AAC, since an open integrated data ecosystem is an investment for all three RIO conventions.
Thank you.
Thank you, Mr.
Brinks.
I will now give the floor to Mr.
Cans Casera, User Engagement and Manager AGO Secretariat Regional Center of Mapping of Resources for Development.
You have the floor.
Thank you.
Thank you, Chair.
It's indeed a privilege to share with us the amazing work that has been done so far, looking at when we first became part of this and to this far.
We're really grateful for this opportunity.
And on behalf of my colleagues back at home, it's been a pleasant journey to be part of this.
Colleagues, allow me to mention that 50 years ago, the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa and then Organization of Africa Unity, now the African Union, established three centers in Africa to support mapping, and one of them is the Regional Center for mapping of resources for Development.
The three centers for the North Side of Africa, that is Citron, the Regional Center for Mapping up the North, and then we have Rectus for the West Africa, and then the Regional Center for Mapping of resources for development for the East southern part of Africa with the six interesting mandates.
Therefore, 50 years down the line, it's a privilege to share this particular information with all of us.
So the action areas, we support land administration and management, climate change, and disaster risk reduction, ecosystem management, biodiversity and blue economy in data and innovation.
The member states, colleagues, it's interesting to me that beyond borders.
45% of the Africa population lives or resides in the East and southern part of Africa.
Therefore, it's been a pleasure to serve the 600 million people in these particular countries and beyond borders.
These are people, these are resources.
These are stretched resources that I think there is a need for us to continue planning and to make sense and to improve the quality of life in those particular countries.
As a regional support hub, the center has done quite a lot.
We support 18 countries, Angola to South Sudan.
And we've managed to achieve the following so far.
Apart from the feedback systems that are being available to us by UN CCD, you can be able to reach out to the various colleagues for support for those particular countries.
We've conducted regional capacity building workshops in Dhaka 18th to 21st and also in Nairobi 15 to 18 of June.
This really made it interesting because we were looking at aspect of countries being able to access praise, countries being able to look at the data inside the system and make sense out of the data.
Countries being able to look at the national data they have and how that can be part and parcel of the process as well.
As we all aware that it's better for us to use the national datasets, but in case countries are not able to have that, then I think that has been provided for as well.
It's been amazing to look at how do we update the various covered datasets that we have and all the other datasets that are made for us for the reporting.
It's also interesting in the sense that Amy is the help desk for GOA LDN, and this is part of the leverage process that we are working on to make sure that we are able to bring on board all the existing efforts on the ground.
We've also conducted specific country seminars, virtual seminars with all the various countries to really help us to dig deeper into ways in which we can be able to support it.
We spent our July having meetings with various countries to really look at the needs and the gaps to enable us to support them at those various needs.
What we've achieved so far, we've built capacity on user race.
We've managed to leverage on GLDN and this is because they use the same data infrastructure.
They also use the same set information, and so it's been amazing to look at how the interface has been.
We're also supporting countries now to update their land cover maps to the national level.
There have been technical exchange, peer to peer review among the countries, and so I think they better understand the systems and how the reporting should look like, and we hope to get a better report for this year's reporting.
There have been data validation and data gaps and needs that came from the various country specific seminars that we had, and this is one of the things that led us to support the countries in updating their national and caver datasets.
Also, we've managed to incorporate the land degradation status as a session.
The forthcoming Africa Group on Earth Observation Symposium, that will be held in Nigeria.
And so we are looking at a platform where Africa can sit and share the status of each country, and this will also contribute to the peer to peer process that we are pushing through.
Allow me to end the chair.
Thank you very much, Mr.
Casera.
I will now give the floor to Mr.
Mustafa Mimi, Director of the Technology, Information and Remote Sensing Department of the Saha and Sahel Observatory.
You have the.
Thank you, Chair.
So We are trying to summarize what we are doing at OSS in terms of supporting the countries for global methodology with regional expertise in Africa, but also through data platforms and services.
So for OSS, we are international intergovernmental organization with 28 Africa member countries, eight African sub regional organizations and international partners, FAO and UNC City and civil society members.
So our institutional mandate is structured around water, land, climate, and biodiversity and which is supported by foresight information management and capacity development.
So we have been also appointed as UNCCD reporting Sub under the 2026 cycle, and we expect to continue this collaboration for the next reporting cycle.
And our support role is around Earth observation, data services, decision support systems, and national capacity strengthening.
So the idea behind that, which is part of our mandate is to make the UNCD reporting more comparable globally, but still reflecting the national specificities, especially in the context in the African context.
So in terms of the case support activities in 2026, we started with two webinars for nglopnne froncophone parties where we have more than 70 participants.
The idea is to explain the new guidelines, what have been produced so far and how we can start the collaboration with the partners.
Then thanks to the USC but also to the HCMRD we work together to organize two regional workshops.
The first one was in Dhaka in May 2025 2026, sorry, and the second one was in Nairobi in June.
So the idea is that we gather all the African countries African the National focal points plus the reporting officer to discuss about the new updates in terms of approaches, but also how to deal with national datasets and how to be aligned with UNCD guidelines.
Then we are also working with some country technical assistance like Nigia Toga, Sudan, Uganda, Libya, Cité and Tunisia.
And the idea is that very simple, as long as a country as a party drop dedicated mail which is reporting at office.org dott, we just set up the dedicated webinar series, and then we start working on the data and its alignment with the guidelines.
And then we are continuing the backstopping help desk, price connect dedicated challenges, and a visual coordination.
The operational logic was starting with the supporting, training the trainers, but also training the national teams, national consultants, and then troubleshoot if they are facing any issues, and then we help them also to the validation, but also through the quality assurance.
So the first lesson was that, in terms of data, we are missing data.
We have international data set, but also we did our best as African institution to provide our OSS kit of indicators.
We are developing the land cover maps for 20 2025, 2019 and 2023, sorry, to be aligned with the UNCD goals, but also the land cover changes, the land productivity using 30 meters per se resolution, but also the carbon stock at the whole indicator.
So the idea is that to make available for non expert in GS remote sensing all the data sets which are produced by OSS, but not only The data which has been also produced by FAO, VOCA, GRC, and other technical partners are already there, which also, they are already there.
For national consultation, they can use only the platform to see how things are going on and we can support later on if they see any anomalies or they want to overlay down the national datasets.
Then also, we are working with RCMRD in synergy and complementary to strengthen this technical support.
Whatever the RCMRD or OSS have been involved, so we just support these countries.
Then the main lesson was that data is available, but it's not available.
We have land cover data sets, land productivity, et cetera, but it doesn't reflect the African specificities.
Then sometimes the national data is spread over different technical institutions, which is a more challenging question.
Then we have also some formal data sharing protocols which they are not very flexible.
The idea is that stimulate the needs, stimulate the exchange around the national constitution meetings with stakeholders and then go beyond so that all the parties can share the data and can refine and fine tune the indicators.
And what is appreciated is that the UNCCD has already started this process last year with the training of trainers and it will continue even beyond let's expect that to continue beyond the reporting cycle.
So In our point of view as a regional organization, we can think about the regional data platforms could help harmonization.
First, accessibility and decision making.
But the lessons, what we learned is that we can put all the data together in one reference, making single point access for datasets, et cetera, but at the same time, we need to preserve the country ownership and data protection.
We need to fine tune the indicators, but also we need to improve the comparability and focus on the data reliability.
The second thing is that we need to invest in inter operability because reporting is about comparing the progress made towards the four years of reporting cycle.
Then what we appreciate from other projects and initiatives that we are trying to build regional committees of practices for continuous learning beyond the reporting deadlines.
A, we think that it's relevant to think about how to continue the role of the staffing call centers beyond the reporting cycle.
Yes, regional platforms should make the national evidence easier to access, to compare, to validate, and to use, but without replacing the national ownership.
Thank you so much.
Thank you very much, Mr.
Mimuni.
I will now give the floor to doctor Saud La Awily, Deputy Chief Executive Officer at the National Center for Vegetation Cover Development and Combating Desertification.
Please, you have the floor.
Sahi Salk.
It's my pleasure to be here.
Thanks a lot for this opportunity.
I I'll be talking today about our experience as an N CPC with reporting with 16 different countries.
First, I'm working for the NCPC which is the mandate of the agencies is conserve and obserification, combat desertification and monitoring plant diversity, and other things.
To achieve these objectives, we have strategies, comprehensive monitor survey, assist current state of desertification and assist invasive National drought plan and rehabilitation of degraded lands.
Also, the NCPC works in all international and regional initiatives on combating desertification and drought resilience led by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, like the G 20 Middle East Green Initiative, R Global Drought resilience partnership, also with the UN CCD CP 16.
Main activity of the NCPC and regional support hub of the ON CVD under the 2026 reporting process.
We have a problem actually in the hybrid arid ecosystem because there is a sparse vegetation, it's very difficult to assess the barometers, such as land productivity, vegetation cover, soil carbon content.
So what we did in the CVC, our team, they survey all the countries field survey.
Plus satellite imagery, they use 10 meters scale, and they use all the three UNCCD three methods, 2021, 2026 FAO OCAT.
And this is the first time that a field survey very truly throughout the kingdom is being used.
16 countries was trained by the NCVC and most of them fall within the arid and semi arid environment.
What we did first, we organized five online training sessions that provide an overall on reporting requirement to the five strategy objective, explain the feature of the price for able.
All country presented efforts in meeting reporting requirement and challenges.
All sessions were recorded presentation and also recorded and shared with all participants.
About 40 to 50 participants attend each online session.
Then in June 2026, there is there is a a training where they came to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for three days.
They share field work.
The focus actively demonstrate revolting for the strategy objective, practical exercise working to involve all participant, live broadcast of all in person session, about 30 participants attended in person session.
All countries presented effort toward combat desertification and drought on W dissertation and drought day.
After the training, the NCBC kept in touch with all the participant and the countries.
In addition, there is a dedicated expert who were assigned to provide technical and logical support to each individual country.
Shared information between support hubs and countries was available instantly.
Review and implemented of information prepared by each country is presented in progress.
So what approaches and innovation have been proven most effective and supporting countries facing hybrid condition? As I said, we use all of the three methods of the UN CDCDD, the 2021, 2025 FAO CAT.
In addition, we use the field survey We use the ten meter scale of the satellite photos.
What we found that 2025 works better in arid and semi arid environment.
This work is still going on.
We have an international expert we are working with.
Some of them are known for the UN CCD and we hope that our result will be coming within six to one year to be published in our report.
As I said, there was five webinars most effective in identifying the technical gaps and understanding reporting requirement before in person training workshop, training materials and video recorded enable participant to use as the reference, working relationship strengthening after ear training between technical expert of regional support Hub and concerned stakeholder in member countries.
Thanks a lot.
Thank you very much, doctor Sah Lily Ara Wiley.
I will now give the floor to miss Aswa Amelsa, Digital Earth Pacific Program Manager, Pacific Community.
You have the floor.
Thank you, Chair and thank you to the UNCCD Secretariat for inviting SPC to contribute to this panel.
It is a pleasure to share our Pacific experience as one of the UNCCD support hubs for the 2026 reporting.
SPC or Pacific Community is the principal scientific and technical organization in the Pacific region.
We are owned and governed by our members, and we work across many sectors.
We work across many sectors from land, agriculture, climate to ocean, data, statistics, and governance.
Through the Digital Earth Pacific, one of SPC's integrated programs, we provide shared Earth observations infrastructure, decades of satellite data, technical expertise, and capacity building to Pacific island countries.
This allows us to bring data, sector knowledge, and country priorities in ways that support decision making and sustainable development.
SPC is the UN CCD support hub.
During the 2026 reporting cycle, SPC is supporting 14 Pacific countries in the region.
We help the countries understand the reporting requirements, access and assess available data, use tools such as the Praise F and the Trans Earth and development of national voluntary targets.
So the key activities and achievements to date we have supported through multiple channels.
We participated in the UNCCD convened a regional Capacity Building workshop in Raratonga Cook Islands in April this year, and we use this as also an opportunity to hold bilateral discussions with each and every country.
We've established a support hub help desk to check requests from countries from first contact up through to resolution of the support that's requested.
We hold recurring regional webinars.
This is aimed to encourage peer learning and also shape progress on reporting.
We have also delivered targeted national training.
An example of this is a five day virtual training for Solomon Islands that was focused on the reporting tools and the LDN indicators that we held early in July.
In addition, we've developed practical guidance products, including consultant terms of reference templates, inclusive consultation guidance, and other materials as countries put their requests forward to us.
Data suitability is an ongoing technical assistance where we're looking at the validation and data needs and gaps assessment.
The question for SPC has been, how can reporting support mechanisms be better tailored to the specific challenges and priorities of small island developing states? There's maybe five points that I would like to highlight in our reflection on this.
One is the data needs to fit be fit for the islands.
Global datasets are very essential as we all know, but they do not always capture the realities of small islands.
For some pacific countries, a single pixel can represent large proportion or even an entire island feature.
This is why high resolution national datasets are often necessary if reporting is to accurately reflect conditions on the ground.
The second is to simplify and accelerate support.
Countries value the reporting assistance, but support is most effective when it arrives early.
Many Pacific administrations have small teams and often the same people have multiple responsibilities, so early access to funding and simpler administration processes would allow countries to undertake reporting in a more consultative and nationally owned manner.
We also need to connect reporting to implementation.
Countries do not report to simply meet the obligations as we know, they report because they want to improve land management, restore ecosystems, and build resilience.
When countries are implementing land degradation neutrality activities between the reporting cycles, they are also generating better information for future reporting.
So we can say better implementation leads to better data, better data leads to better reporting.
We also need to recognize the realities of geography.
Pacific countries are spread across vast oceans, often with small technical teams and high travel requirements.
Field validation and consultations require time and resources.
Reporting models and timelines therefore need to recognize the realities geographicality Sense island states face.
Lastly, to strengthen partnerships.
Regional institutions such as Pacific Community and the rest of the panel members here Bring trusted relationships, technical expertise and regional context.
Global networks such as the group on Earth observations bring access to innovation, methodologies, and specialized expertise at the global level, as we have seen with the GOLDN toolkits.
When these capabilities are connected, countries receive more coordinated support and can better address reporting needs across the Rio conventions and other frameworks such as the endine.
So for the SPC in participating in this Support Hb, this model has demonstrated the value of linking global methodologies and expertise with regional expertise and national priorities.
Looking ahead, we could say our collective objective should be to ensure that the reporting is not only about submitting reports, but also about helping countries guide action, mobilize investment, and advance integration neutrality on the ground.
Thank you, Chair.
Thank you very much, miss Melissa.
I will now give the floor to Mr.
Ronan Francis, Executive Director of the Partnership Initiative for Sustainable Land Management.
You have the floor.
Okay.
Thank you, Chair.
Well, this afternoon, I just want to briefly share with the audience how co production between the countries, PISLM and our technical partners, Apachea help to strengthen national ownership and improve the quality of the data that is built and leads to a more sustainable reporting.
Now, just to touch a little bit on who PSLM are, we are intergovernmental organization in the Caribbean sanctioned by Caricm and our aim is to further SDG 15 with particular emphasis on land degradation neutrality.
And we function more to coordinate in terms of policy and practice and strengthen capacity throughout Caribbean states.
And we tend to share these experiences with our global states partners.
Now, we believe that countries that build data tend to order report.
Currently, we are working with 13 countries within Caribbean, and our focus really is to bring that collaboration and that unity where the reporting is concerned.
Now, we know that global methodologies are really essential for consistency and compatibility, but they don't always capture the peculiarities and the particular circumstances on the ground for small islands.
So data development and institutional capacity building and national circumstances can differ, especially in our small islands.
So it's important for us to support these countries in terms of, uh, bringing all of those points to the floor and ensuring that the production of these datasets and the technical output is solid.
So our objective really here is therefore, not simply to complete the reporting, but to also strengthen the country's ability to understand and validate and use the evidence behind that report.
So in our Caribbean sees, there is a partnership that we would have developed between ourselves, Apachea and the countries.
And each partner has its particular role to help to deliver on the reporting and to strengthen capacity in our 13 countries that we work with.
So PSLM we provide that regional coordination among the countries, and we convene national focal points, the technicians, the stakeholders, and we facilitate dialogue among the countries so that we can maintain that momentum throughout the reporting cycle and after.
Apachta brings to the table their technical analysis.
They have a lot of experience in high resolution land cover data products and PS LM and Apachea have been developing or co producing new LPD data products as well and other tools to compare the data products available to the countries and those that we are working with so that they can make sound decisions.
Now, the countries, they remain at the center.
So the national experts, they review the information, they test this data against the national conditions on the ground, they identify the issues and they determine what is the appropriate national circumstance for them and the quality of their data.
But most importantly, that I want to emphasize is that the countries are the ones who make the final decisions.
We are only the technical support and providing that backstopping.
So As it regards to the co production of the data on the screen here, we have an example.
This is syncits.
Firstly, countries are allowed to assess their global data, their default datasets and determine whether or not they are adequate enough and they reflect the national conditions for their small islands.
Further than that, as a technical group, we support in terms of um, comparing and refining those datasets.
So when necessary, the national datasets and the technical models and the outputs are compared, and we assist the countries in understanding the differences, the assumptions, and the implications of the available options.
But in the end, it is the countries that again, needs to validate Thus far we have done validation workshops in five of the nine countries that have completed using new LPD products out of the 13, and in particular here, the case in St.
Kitts, they had two datasets to choose from.
So they had the national team.
They identified the ML LPD dataset 2001-2015, and also the customized data product that we developed between ourselves and Apachea.
However, you know, there were some areas that were showing some false positives across the mapping, and we were able to work with the country to iron out these misclassifications.
We would have gone on the ground with a national team and did some manual digitization so that we could have reclassified the map and have something that is more stable and that was co produced and would be inputted into the report.
So why this strengthened an ownership of the collaboration between ourselves, Apachea and the countries.
For one, it first, it builds national capacity, and that is something that we are encouraging.
So national experts working on the data themselves, they tend to have a deeper understanding of the app process, the indicators, the datasets, the technical methodologies as well, which underpin the reporting, and that is quite important so that the countries can start to own the process.
Second, it strengthens the institutions.
So the national working groups, the custodians, the GIS units, we help to connect because sometimes you may consider that our islands are small, but even within those small spaces, that connectivity is not always there.
So we help to connect all of the major players, the institutions, and to ensure that that knowledge is shared, it's built, and not lost between reporting cycles.
Thirdly, we want to ensure that we create reusable data.
So the datasets that are developed and validated through the process can be maintained and used beyond the UNCCD reporting cycle, and this is where we refer mostly to, you know, our conventions and being able to reuse those datasets in our other national activities.
So national capacity and institutional memory must be maintained and the evidence that is there needs to be usable for the long term.
So finally, three commitments that we think that are essential for the furtherance of the reporting and the building among our countries.
First, we need to sustain regional support and the regional technical hubs that have made their presentations here today, PISLM one of them.
We need to encourage more PL learning among the help desk, and we should continue the reporting and the dialogue beyond the reporting cycle.
So countries should not have to rebuild their technical capacity every time there is a reporting deadline.
So that continuity needs to flow beyond the submission of the PS reports.
We also recognize that there needs to be more investment into national data systems.
So we need to strengthen the national data custodians, validate mechanisms, and institutional capacity.
So not simply finance and production of the reports, but going further and deeper into the process.
And finally, we need to make the PRS build one platform that services across all your conventions.
So the same data that is produced under this PRS reporting cycle could be used under the CBD or the UNF TPAC process where this data can inform decision making surrounding ecosystem services and all the other activities.
So as I opened, it's important to build confidence and an institutional memory among the systems so that they can endure beyond the reporting process.
So As I said, countries that are involved in building the data tends to own the report.
And when countries own the data, they are better positioned as we have seen in the Caribbean to maintain it, to use it, and to make decisions for the longer term.
Thank you, Chair.
Thank you very much, Mr.
Francis.
I wish to thank again all of the other representative of the support hubs present today for their presentation.
We will now hear interventions from representatives of the technical advisory institutions supporting the 2026 UN CCD reporting process.
I request each representative to limit their intervention to 2 minutes maximum.
I now give the floor to the representative of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
You have the floor.
Please give the floor to 256.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
This is UNDP.
Can I go ahead? I now give the floor to the representative of the FAO, please.
It's here.
Hi.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you for the technician also.
Thank you for the opportunity to address the audience.
FAO through this reporting cycle has been acting as technical advisors to both HEB and DEF implementing agency in close coordination and cooperation with UN CCD and partners.
Through this effort, FAO has supported the announcement of the overall quality of the report and specifically on SO one and SDG 15.3 0.1.
FAA has also contributed to strengthening the national land stewardship through participatory process and co design analytical tool.
FAO has facilitated and reinforced peer to peer exchange amongst country.
As technical advisor and support hub, FAO has co organized the regional capacity building and Peer exchange for Annex three and contributed to the regional capacity building workshop for Annex two while also providing support through the Price Up desk.
As F implementing agency, FAO is providing direct support to 21 countries under the pilot project for F eight enabling Activity Finance, data and reporting.
FAO support enabled early engagement with country well ahead of the in country project operationalization.
This tailored technical backstopping and in depth training delivered results.
By July 2026, 50% of the countries supported had completed the SON reporting process with data ready to be uploaded.
More importantly, this participatory and flexible approach has strengthened national ownership of result and greater use of national data.
In this way, FAO contributes to robust, country driven, and country tailored approaches that are pivotal for effective land degradation neutrality policy, programs and projects well beyond reporting.
In closing, FAO reaffirms its commitment to this reporting cycle and future ones.
We will continue to draw on our technical expertise and our extensive network of decentralized offices.
To support UN CCD parties.
FAO would like to express its appreciation to the UNCCD Secretariat, the parties and partners, including the user Support apps for the true spirit of partnership, mutual learning, and experience sharing.
Thank you.
Thank you very much to the representative of the FAO and sorry again for the technical difficulties.
I will now give the floor to the representative of the European Space Agency on behalf of Group on Earth observations, Land Degradation neutrality Initiatives.
I think you're speaking from the microphone 270, we have you.
Thank you.
I would like to thank the chair and the panelists for their insightful presentations.
As representative of the European Space Agency and Geo LDN co chair, I'm giving this statement on behalf of Geo LDN.
We would like to highlight once again the tremendous opportunity that Earth observation offers for supporting the implementation of the Rio Conventions.
However, the challenge today is no longer only about data availability.
The value of Earth observation is not only measured by the quality of the data provided, but by how effectively these data reach countries and support implementation through trusted regional partnerships.
This is where regional support mechanisms become essential.
Regional institutions understand the local context, can provide continuous technical assistance and help countries build long term capacities beyond individual reporting cycles.
In response to decision two, cop 16, eLDhn has enhanced its collaboration with regional institutions, initiatives, and organizations to provide data and technical support to parties, for example, through its regional Dialogue forum in the Pacific and its global Dialogue forum.
It creates a bridge between the Earth observation community, regional technical institutions, and the needs of countries implementing the Rio Convention.
GOLDN under the umbrella of GEO, provides an opportunity to better coordinate existing capacities and initiatives helping countries navigate the growing ecosystem of Earth observation services while avoiding duplication of efforts.
This coordination is particularly important as many Earth observation datasets and services can support not only the UNCCD but also the implementation and reporting requirements of the other region REO conventions.
Looking ahead, we see great potential in the coordination network of regional support hubs by combining regional expertise with capabilities of Earth observation community.
Thank you.
Thank you very much to the representative of the European Space Agency.
I will now give the floor to the representative of the World overview of conservation approaches and technologies WCT Thank you, Madam Chair.
It is a pleasure to speak on behalf of WCT and the Center for Development and Environment of the University of Bern.
First, I would like to thank the UNCCD Secretariat, particularly the STI unit and the support hubs, the parties and our fellow global technical advisors for the excellent collaboration throughout the still ongoing 2026 reporting process.
What gives us the greatest satisfaction is seeing approaches that we in WCT have advocated for together with the parties for many years now being embraced and scaled up.
For WCT, reporting is not an end in itself.
It is an opportunity to build national capacities, strengthen institutions, connect science with policy, and ultimately move from data to decisions.
We have long championed a very simple principle.
Global methodologies must be scientifically robust and transparent while remaining flexible enough to recognize national data, national knowledge, national capacities, and national priorities.
Country ownership is essential in the reporting process.
We have translated this principle into concrete guidance.
Two key publications were recently co produced and published with the UNCCD the land story and the addendum to the good practice guidance for SDG 15.3 0.1.
The addendum strengthens guidance on participatory approaches and the use of national data for mapping land condition, and for the first time, it provides an open methodology to assess the balance between degradation and improvement and therefore actually track progress towards LDN.
But guidance alone is not enough.
WCT has been working with the support hubs and directly with countries to build the capacities needed to put these approaches into practice.
WCT and CDE have invested significant effort in making this possible.
Much of this work has been supported through CDE and WCTs own core resources because we do believe that this process matters.
And this is also why global technical advisors are important.
While diversity and regional national contexts must be recognized, UNCCD reporting also requires a common and coherent global approach.
Technical advisors help provide that breach.
Our role extends well beyond developing and explaining methodologies.
We help translate global guidance into regional and national contexts, connect institutions and experiences across countries and regions, respond to emerging technical challenges, and ensure consistency while maintaining the flexibility needed for country ownership.
Looking ahead, we therefore encourage parties to recognize and strengthen the role of not only the support hubs that are in the plenary, but also of us the global technical advisors in the current and future reporting processes.
If reporting becomes a learning process rather than simply a reporting exercise, we are not only measuring progress towards LDN, we are helping parties achieve it.
Thank you very much.
Thank you very much to the representative of Wukat.
I will now give the floor to the representative of Apachea.
You have the floor.
Speaking from microphone 276, I think.
Thank you, Chair.
It is a privilege to be here on behalf of Apachea Foundation.
I would like to thank the Secretariat of the UN CCD, perhaps, the technical advisors and all our colleagues for creating this space for collaboration.
Apachea is the smallest organization in this network.
We are a young non profit, but not new to this work.
We were born from many years of collaboration with UN CCD and many of the institutions that are present here and our partners in developing practical solutions for countries working on land degradation neutrality.
One area where this showing work has been particularly important is in the SIT context, together with PISLM, conservation, international and CVAS.
We have developed high resolution cover maps and land productivity dynamic map, both key indicators for this reporting process.
What has been most encouraging is seeing countries take ownership of this data, use it beyond reporting.
This is exactly what we believe technical innovation should enable.
Putting information and tools into the hands of countries so that they can make better decisions.
Our work with PISLM in the Caribbean Seas has shown us how powerful this approach can be and it points to the importance of longer term programs that can provide continuity and capacity development between reporting periods so that technical work translates into actions and does not stop when reporting cycles ends.
Through our role as technical advisors, Apacha was able to support countries in several regions in coordination with different superhaps using methods first developed for SIDS, helping non SETS countries report at high resolution for the first time.
We are also supporting the UNCCD reporting hers here at Cop 17.
You will find us in Pavilion C and in SS Pavilion, if you have any further questions.
We may be a small organization, but our experience is clear.
This is not a process any one institution can deliver alone.
The way forward is through partnership is country driven, and Apachea stands ready to keep contributing to that effort.
Thank you, Chair.
Thank you very much to the Representative of Apachea.
Now I will give the floor to the representative of Conservation International.
You have the floor.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Conservation International has been honored to support the convention since 2016 by developing geospatial tools, data, and methodologies that assist countries In monitoring land condition, assessing SDG Indicator 15.3 0.1 and advancing the goal of LDN.
In the current reporting cycle, Conservation International is pleased to serve as technical advisor supporting the UN CCD Secretariat, the regional support hubs, and counter parties in the application of Earth observation, data inters analytical tools.
In addition, we've been pleased to collaborate with LDN flagship to respond to decision 20 cop 15 by developing a report on incorporating climate futures into LDN planning.
We deeply appreciate the decisions, requests, and invitations from parties through the UNCCD, including the invitation for Conservation International to continue enhancing the trends.org platform and to address technical issues identified in the previous reporting cycles.
Through a F eight funded project, Conservation International is leading the development of 30 meter spatial resolution datasets for all smaller developing states.
In close collaboration with the regional support hubs, we have contributed to four capacity building workshops for the 2026 reporting cycle, providing technical support to national focal points and experts from approximately 90 countries.
As global coordinator of the JF eight ecosystem restoration Integrated Program, Conservation International is supporting 21 countries in advancing restoration and LDN growth.
ERP is helping drive the restoration of approximately 1.7 million hectares while advancing implementation of UNCCD strategic framework.
And as countries prepare their next round of indices, Conservation International is providing tools and technical support to help minister set finest ready nature bath based targets through 2035.
Conservation International remains committed to supporting UN CCD, its counter parties and partners in delivering timely, consistent, and high quality national reporting.
Thank you.
Thank you very much to the representative of Conservation International, and I thank all the representative of the technical and advisory institutions for their contributions.
I will now give the floor to the chair of the committee on Science and Technology to conduct the exchange with parties and observers.
I thank the chair of the committee for the review of the implementation of the convention.
It's a pleasure to co chair this joint meeting with you.
Participants are advised that the floor is now open for comments and questions by parties and observers.
Participants wishing to take the floor are requested to press the microphone button now.
We'll proceed to hear statements from the floor.
I give the floor to the representative of Liberia.
Thank you, Chair.
At the outset of this first time since we're taking this floor, The Liberian delegation wishes to express appreciation to the government and people of Mongolia for the warm hospitality extended to our delegation since we arrived in this beautiful city of Ulamatar and to the Cp presidency, the UNIC City Secretariat, and all parties for the constructive manner in which the work of this conference is being conducted.
Liberia aligns itself with statements made on behalf of the African group and wishes to offer a few additional observations in our national capacity.
On this important agenda item.
Chair, Liberia welcomes the continued efforts to improve the quality, consistency, and usefulness of national reporting under the convention, including through prise four, regional support hubs, Earth observation, and strengthened technical assistance for Liberia.
However, national reporting must be understood as more than a periodic obligation under the convention.
It should also be an investment in lasting national capacity.
The resources, technologies, and technical assistance provided for reporting should leave countries with stronger institutions, trained national experts, improved geospatial data sets, and functional monitoring system that can continue to support land use planning, restoration, drought preparedness, and national development long after a reporting circle has ended.
In this regard, Liberia wishes to emphasize three points.
First, Nationally reported information and official national reports must remain under the authority of parties.
Global and default datasets are valuable, particularly where national data gaps exist, but they should support and complement, not replace technicalally sound and nationally validated information.
Second, The increased application of GIS, Earth observation, Cloud technologies, and artificial intelligence presents tremendous opportunities for implementation of the convention.
However, these technologies must be accompanied by sustained capacity building, technology transfer, and institutional support for effective developing counterparties.
Our objective should not simply be to give countries access to externally generated information.
It should be to strengthen their ability to generate, validate, interpret, and apply that information themselves.
Third, tier, improved reporting requires adequate, predictable, and timely financial support.
Delays in accessing enabling resources inevitably affect national consultations, technical analysis, data validation, and ultimately the quality and timeliness of national reports.
Liberia therefore supports strengthening regional support hubs, African technical institutions, South South cooperation, and peer learning while ensuring that these mechanisms remain responsive to national circumstances and needs.
Cheers.
As we consider the future reporting architecture of this convention, Liberia believes that one principle should guide us.
Reporting should not only measure implementation, it should strengthen our capacity to implement a successful reporting system should therefore leave every reporting country better equipped to manage its land, understand its vulnerabilities, and to make evidence based decisions for its people.
The Republic of Liberia stands ready to work constructively with the CRC, the CSD, and all parties toward a reporting system that is scientifically robust, nationally owned, adequately supported, and genuinely useful for national decision making and implementation.
Chair, thank you.
I thank the representative of Liberia.
I now give the floor to the representative of Argentina, followed by Uganda and Algeria.
Can we give the floor to Argentina, please? Okay.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you, Madam Chair of the Creek as well.
Argentina should also like to thank the institutions represented in the panel.
Thank you to those who took the floor before.
Well All of you have made a great effort in this reporting process.
I thank the Secretariat as well for the efforts deployed in preparing this process and in the document and in preparing the document that we are commenting on.
The document underscores that even though we have seen a solid basis for high quality reporting, there are challenges that remain disparity in national capacity being one, as well as the long processing time of big datasets.
Argentina is part of the FAO program for reporting.
And we should note the efficient time management and resource management as well as the technical support and true involvement and buy in of the national offices of the FA in this process.
Added to this, the exercises that we've undertaken in previous reporting periods and thus we are optimistic that we will have a better report now at the end of the period.
Argentina uses national data and we appreciate the data nationally that have supported the process, we should like to underscore that with the support of the reporting team and executive Secretariat, we have been able to resolve mapping problems referring to border issues that arose in the 2022 report.
In preliminary testing, we do see load problems for countries such as ours with large volumes of data.
This does give rise still to difficulties in processing.
We'd like to underscore the role of the reports as truly useful tools in decision making nationwide and to note the importance of the implementation of the convention also across the country for the report to be used and leveraged.
There is a need for broadening and contextualization.
This is a A detailed process currently we don't have the resources to do this.
Those in charge of this process and reporting are just barely sufficient for the drafting of the core report and for undertaking minimal validation processes.
These processes should be borne in mind when designing reports after 2030.
I thank you kindly.
I thank the representative of Argentina.
I now give the floor to the representative of Uganda.
Distinguished guest, distinguished delegates.
Uganda appreciates UN CCD effort of giving technical backstopping and assistance through regional and international institutional partners towards capacity building for praise reporting and beyond.
This effort is enabling parties to achieve their goals beyond appraise reporting to the implementation of various land management activities.
Having in place regional hubs to give technical support to national reporting is a great idea.
The recent related capacity building on praise reporting exposed CSTs to tools that enable participatory examination and comparison of various datasets before selecting the appropriate ones.
CSTs also had an opportunity to connect with the technical experts in these regional hubs.
In this context, Uganda appreciates Ara EMRD, Apachea, OSS Conservation International, and worker for the Nairobi B Joint Technical Support workshop given to enable parties to progress with the praise reporting process.
We are moving towards a situation where more and more local experiences will be integrated into the development of global database datasets.
The current tools should be developed further to enable the local scientists to use local experiences in the classification of satellite data through partnerships and synergized investments at multilateral and party level.
We are also of the view that support should go beyond the reporting to sustaining national databases.
Under the Sentinels for Land Degradation neutrality Project funded by the European Space Agency, ISA, led by Vito Remote Sensing in collaboration with loaned University Jeff, Zed, Wagenn University, and Conservation International.
Uganda was involved in the development of high resolution datasets for use in LDN reporting.
We are looking forward to the possibility of using these datasets for the current reporting.
I thank you.
I thank the representative of Uganda.
I now give the floor to the representative of Algeria.
Thank you, Mr.
Chair.
My delegation thanks the Secretariat for the progress made in improving the information reporting system and the quality of reports.
At the outset, we would like to stress that the reporting process is not merely an obligation under the convention.
It must first and foremost, generate useful knowledge that enables countries to guide their policies and field interventions.
In this regard, we welcome the progress made under the Praise for reporting system, the growing use of Earth observation data, and the development of high resolution data.
However, we believe it is essential to maintain a balance between global data and data produced at the national level.
Satellite based data and international databases are necessary to ensure a shared vision and enable comparison between countries.
Yet, their accuracy and relevance must be significantly improved when measured against field conditions and national scientific knowledge.
This issue is of a particular importance for Algeria given the diversity of its landscape and territories which extend from north to south, starting from the Mediterranean zone through mountainous and step areas to the southern regions characterized by an arid climate.
We would like also to emphasize that harmonizing methodologies should not lead to a standardization of ecological reality.
It is essential to provide internationally comparable indicators while at the same time enabling countries to use their own complementary data and methodologies whenever they are able to characterize the specific features of their territories.
We therefore encourage greater involvement of national scientific institutions in the reporting process, not only to supply data, but also to produce it, validate it, and interpret it, and contribute to its use in planning.
We also support strengthening regional support centers and helping them develop lasting expertise.
Regional cooperation and peer learning among countries should enable the exchange of results, as well as methodologies, challenges encountered, and solutions developed in similar contexts.
Finally, we believe the real objective lies in moving beyond the traditional reporting cycle, monitoring, measurement, reporting, towards building a more meaningful cycle based on data, analysis, decision, action, follow up on results.
This evolution is what we will make information reporting system a genuine tool for monitoring land degradation drought and the restoration of degraded land in the service of national policies and the implementation of the convention.
Thank you.
I thank the representative of Algeria.
I give the floor to the representative of the European Union, followed by Uruguay and Lesotho.
Thank you, Mr.
Chair and Distinguished delegates and representative of the EU and its 27 member states fully support fully support the 2026 UN CCD reporting process, a cornerstone for achieving land degradation neutrality, and the UN CCD Strategic Framework 2080 2030.
We welcome the regional support hubs.
Their contribution in methodological guidance, geospatial tools, and participatory processes have been instrumental in strengthening national reporting capacity.
We support exploring the possibility for regional support Hs to serve as centers of excellence.
We emphasize that the procedure for selecting or designating regional support apps and technical advisory institution must be open, fair, and transparent.
We also highlight the critical role of technical advisory and the role of the group on Earth observation, and degradation neutrality flagship to continue to offer a space for dialogue between Earth observations, community and parties.
We command the regional workshop train 2,231 participants from 92 countries, thereby promoting peer learning and gender balanced participation.
The EU and its 27 member states acknowledge the critical role of international and South South cooperation, particularly through the Pacific Seeds Forum and UN CCD Ses Forum in advancing sustainable land management and climate resilience.
We appreciate the financial and technical support from the Global Environment facility, which benefit more than 100 countries and the contribution of conservation, international, IUCN, and UNDP slash BOCAT in participatory monitoring and the integration of land degradation neutrality.
We also recognize the contribution of F medium size project led by Conservation International IUCN UNDP WA, which enhanced participatory monitoring and LDN integration.
In the light of growing demand for both moderate as well as high resolution long time SRI dataset, We recommend exploring ways to engage with and draw on existing research infrastructure such as the operational company datas ecosystem, an open free access platform, providing sentinel satellite data and derived products and cloud based processing services for Earth observation user.
With this, it could play a key role in enhancing data availability and analytical capacity, particularly for developing countries and small island developing states.
As the deadline of 13 November 26th for ESO one and 26 February 2027, the other ESO approach, we urge all parties to meet this timeline.
We reaffirm our commitment to the 2026 UN CCD reporting process and call for continued collaboration to achieve our shared goal.
Thank you.
I thank the representative of the European Union.
I give the floor to the representative of Uruguay.
Thank you very much, Mr.
Chairman.
Uruguay appreciates the drafting of the document on the improvement in the procedures for communicating information.
And likewise for the work from the Secretariat for making operational the decision COP 16.4.
We particularly appreciate the support received by the Jeff and the FAO.
We appreciate the cooperation and dovetailing with other initiatives and organizations when it comes to capacity building for the parties in drafting their national reports.
Likewise, we underscore the importance of the opportunity to share information, experiences, and progress with our region.
We urge continued efforts towards this exchanges between among parties.
Turning to information, we do value the work on initiatives and platforms that provide global data.
However, we also believe that efforts and resources should be channeled towards the generation of capacity information and data on the national level for the reporting of all strategic objectives.
This would increase the trust and ownership of the results of the evaluations.
Subsequently, this can be incorporated into policy design and used in the establishment of national goals and decision making.
Lastly, we would like to underscore that access to and availability of financial resources is essential if parties are to continue strengthening their capacity to generate information and reports and thus pass along progress in their implementation of their strategic framework.
We believe that it is important to consider support between reporting periods that contribute to compiling and making systematic field data on the national level with indicators and mapping on areas that are degraded and restored.
Uruguay is committed to strengthening of information systems that are solid, transparent, evidence based, and this is essential for the effective implementation of the convention.
Much obliged.
Representative of Uruguay, I give the floor to the representative of Lotu followed by the Republic of Korea and Brazil.
Thank you, Chair.
Distinguished delegates.
The Kingdom of Loto welcomes the process made in strengthening the USSD national reporting process.
Particularly efforts to improve the quality of data, technical capacities, knowledge sharing, and the use of nationally relevant information in reporting.
The kingdom of De Soto also acknowledges with appreciation the important contribution of WCT in advancing the documentation, exchange, and application of knowledge on sustainable land management globally.
We particularly welcome WCAT's work in promoting inclusive and participative decision support approaches that bring together observation data, Scientific knowledge and local knowledge.
In this regard, the Kingdom of the Stu is pleased to work with work hard under the J eight Initiative on inclusive decision support for land degradation neutrality.
This collaboration will strengthen participatory land degradation monitoring and support the integration of scientific and spatial information with national and local knowledge.
Chair, as the Kingdom of the Stu updates its current national report on principle, we are committed to strengthening the use of national data and evidence to ensure that global datasets are complemented by national information, local knowledge, and appropriate validation against current realities.
We believe that reporting should not only fulfill our international obligations, but also generate information that is relevant and actionable for addressing our national land degradation challenges.
For the kingdom of LST, this means moving towards evidence based and context specific solutions, bringing local knowledge, national data, and scientific evidence together to develop local solutions for local land degradation challenges.
Chair, we believe that this approach will strengthen the credibility and usefulness of UNCD reporting platform for while contributing to informed decision making on land degradation neutrality, sustainable land management, land use planning, climate resilience, and biodiversity conservation.
Thank you, Chair.
I thank the representative of Lstu.
I give the floor to the representative, the Republic of Korea.
Thank you Chair.
At the outset, the Republi of Korea would like to express its sincere appreciation to the Secretariat, global mechanism, and all technical partner and expert for their report in preparing this report and supporting parties in 2026 reporting process.
Particularly welcome the continued improvement of phrase four, establishment of regional support hub capacity building workshop, and to enhance the quality and accessibility of the data.
The Republic of Korea would like to highlight four points.
First, national reporting should go beyond fulfilling of Reporting obligation.
Information generated through the USSD reporting process should also support national decision making on sustainable land measurement, LDN implementation, restoration priorities, and drought resilience.
In this regard, strengthening national ownership of data and national technical capacities is particularly important.
Second, global divorce data and national data should be used complementary manner.
Default data provides an important common basis for comparability among parties.
However, where national data are more appropriate to national circumstance, scientifically robust and transparently documented, parties should be able to make appropriate use of such data.
We also welcome increasing availability of higher resolution Earth observation data.
However, higher spatial resolution does not necessarily mean accuracy.
Changes in land cover or land productivity may reflect climate variability, land use history, or management practices.
Therefore, remote sensing information should where possible be complemented by field observation, national dataset, and relevant expert knowledge.
Third, Sustained technical and financial support together with long term capacity building remains essential.
The Republic of Korea appreciated the important role of regional support hub and technical partners.
We engage it continue support throughout the reporting cycle, particularly for developing country parties in need of technical and data capacities.
We also believe that capacities developed through the 2026 reporting process should expand beyond a single reporting cycle.
They should contribute to strengthen long term national monitoring system and over time help reduce the reporting burden on parties.
First, Greater inter operability of data and reporting tools should be encouraged, including appropriate with related processes and the other real conventions in order to help reduce unnecessary duplication in national reporting.
At the same time, such effort should respect the distinct mandate and objectives of each convention, as well as national circumstance and priorities.
The Republic of Korea will continue to contribute, including through the Taiwan initiative by sharing our experiences in international cooperation, land and forest monitoring, field based validation in support of more reliable and policy relevant to USD report system.
Thank you.
I thank the representative of the Republic of Korea.
I give the floor to the representative of Brazil, followed by Senegal and United Arab Emates Thank you, Chair.
Brazil recognizes the importance of improving reporting procedures while emphasizing that such requirements should reflect different national capacities and circumstances.
Reporting must remain an instrument of implementation, not merely information provision.
We therefore support proportionate requirements, adequate means of implementation, including finance, capacity building, technology and access to quality data, and greater recognition of nationally generated data.
Default data should complement, not replace national information.
We also encourage south south, north south and triangular cooperation, as well as regional support.
Finally, reporting should be simplified and interoperable, reducing duplication and administrative burdens while ensuring that new requirements are accompanied by adequate and predictable support.
Thank you.
I thank the representative of Brazil.
I give the floor to the representative of Senegal.
Okay.
Thank you.
Madam Chair of the Critic, thank you as well, the delegation of Senegal, thanks to the Secretariat and the Jeff, as well as the technical partners for the quality of this note.
This work, we commend the Secretariat for the event in Dakar, the capacity building regionally in West Africa for francophones.
That was held together with our observatory for the Sahaln Sahara and the Regional Center for Africa, as well as other stakeholders for Southern Africa, that is, showed the way that some of this can be decentralized.
We hailed the tools and the spatial data through Trans Earth and other tools.
However, addressing all of this data remains complex for the majority of national teams.
Our regional workshop shows that horizontal learning between among countries accelerates the mastery of these topics and this helps to create community for moving ahead towards with the SDGs, the Regional Center should be maintained and strengthened for national ownership that is effective in doing work on the ground with reliable and comparable data.
Senegal encourages the Secretariat and the Jeff to make these exchanges ongoing, as well as capacity building beyond the mere submission of reports.
Reports should not just be a conformity exercise.
These are crucial operations.
Data collection to be fed directly by national territorial work to address the degradation of land and to strengthen synergies with other Rio convention bodies.
We reaffirm our commitment to submit our national report with robust to high quality data within the time frame established for the 2026 cycle.
Thank you.
I thank the representative of Senegal.
I give the floor to the representative of the United Arab Emirates, followed by Nj and China.
Thank you, Chair.
The United Arab Emirates would like to express its sincere appreciation to the government of Mongolia for its warm hospitality and excellent organization and to the UN Secretariat for its efforts in facilitating the negotiations.
The United Arab Emirates support strengthening targeted capacity building as an important means of advancing the effective implementation of the convention.
We welcome continued support for the national reporting, land degradation neutrality, drought resilience, and sand and dust storms, as well as the great use of Earth observation, geospatial technologies, digital tools, and artificial intelligence.
We also encourage practical knowledge exchange, technology transfer, and regional cooperation, taking into account different national circumstance, capacities, and needs.
Regarding the possible future role of regional support hubs or Centers of Excellence, the UAE supports regional mechanisms are demand driven and responsive to the needs and requests of the parties.
Such mechanism should remain advisory and complementary to the existing UN CCD institutions and should not limit the ability of parties to seek direct technical support from the Secretariat when needed.
Any further formulation or evolution of this arrangement should be informed by lessons learned from the 2026 reporting process and remain subject to the consideration and guidance by the parties while avoiding the creation of parallel structures.
In considering possible future arrangements, the UAE also encouraged drawing on relevant experience and good practices and other multilateral environmental frameworks where appropriate, particularly in facilitating technical cooperation, mobilizing expertise, and responding effectively to parties' needs.
The UAE further encourage an inclusive approach to regional cooperation, providing opportunities for interested countries and experts from across the region to contribute their knowledge and experience.
This would strengthen the regional ownership and help ensure that support remains responsive to regional priorities and national needs.
Finally, capacity building and reporting support should fully respect national ownership and authority over reporting and data.
The validation, approval, and submission of national reports, as well as authorization of access to national reporting information should remain the responsibility of the party concerned.
The UAE looks forward to supporting a capacity building approach that is a practical, inclusive, flexible, party driven, and responsive to the different needs and capabilities of parties.
Thank you, Chair.
I thank the representative of the United Arab Emirates.
I give the floor to the representative of Niger, followed by China and Bangladesh.
Thank you, Chairperson.
Niger, thanks the Convention for all of the efforts made to achieve land degradation neutrality in a country like ours where degradation is a central problem.
This is so important.
Niger welcomes the strong presence and commitment of the OSS, the Observatory for the Sahel and Saharan supporting a better knowledge and a more effective monitoring of its natural resources.
In particular, the OSS has contributed to the improvement and harmonization of biophysical and socioeconomic data collection methods as well as to the establishment and development of ecological and environmental monitoring observatories.
However, In the context of the implementation of land degradation neutrality, it would be important first to achieve a baseline at a sufficiently fine cartographic scale adapted to the needs of users.
Such an approach would allow local communities to access data that can be directly used as decision making tools.
This baseline would also provide an essential basis for better monitoring and objective evaluation of land restoration efforts.
In conclusion, Ni appeals to the institutions and organizations that produce and make available satellite imagery to facilitate access to data at a resolution fine enough to allow it to be used at farm level and at community level so that it is truly useful to producers and communities.
Thank you.
I give the floor to the representative of China.
Thank you, Chair.
China expresses its appreciation to the UNCCD Secretariat for its highly effective work on national reporting, as well as to FAO for the technical support provided regarding strategic objective one.
China also highly commends the hard work of the regional support House.
Which have played a critical role in facilitating the preparation and completion of high quality national reports.
China hopes that within the framework of UNCCD, the cooperation with organizations such as the Group of Earth Observation and WCO, the World Artificial Intelligence Corporation, cooperation organization could be strengthened in order to provide better data and tools to all parties.
We have the following suggestions.
First, the Secretariat should at the request of state parties, further consider how to improve the priful online reporting platform and indicator system, taking into full account the relevance of indicators, the availability of data, the scientific soundness of methods, and the reliability of results.
Second, through capacity building and technical support, The Secretariat should provide more guidance on how national monitoring systems can be aligned with global indicators and methodologies, including indicator conversion.
Substantive encouragement should be given to parties to use their own data and proven methods of monitoring assessment so as to avoid duplication, to reduce reporting costs, and to ensure the long term sustainability of reporting.
Third, the Secretariat should provide greater flexibility in the use of default data and improve the accuracy of default datasets.
Fourth, it would be advisable to share with outcome of regional workshops on reporting and to encourage research institutions to take part in related work and to facilitate their contribution to the global framework of indicators.
Thank you.
I thank the representative of China.
I give the floor to the representative of Bangladesh, followed by Zimbabwe and Mexico.
Respected Chair, Distinguished delegates.
Bangladesh, thanks to Secretariat, the global mechanism, and the government and people of Mongolia for hosting Cop 17.
We appreciate the F enabling Activities umbrella Project and all partners for supporting country parties in preparing their 2026 national report.
Mr.
Chair, we particularly welcome the establishment of regional support hubs.
Bangladesh is pleased to be included under the CBA Support Hub, and we thank the organize of the regional Workshop for strengthening our expert technical capacity.
Bangladesh is preparing its 2026 report using global and national data, national expertise and country specific information, which should remain at the heart of the reporting process.
Global dataset and Earth observation products are available when accurate and suited to national condition.
Mr.
Chair.
However, as the coastal Delta T country, Bangladesh faces unique challenges, high code cover, dynamic coastal erosion and salinity intuition require continuously updated, regulation at observation data of 30 meters or finer, which default medium regulation dataset often fail to capture.
We therefore call on the Secretariat and global mechanism to develop such hy regulation dataset ahead of the reporting period.
We also stress timely access to JF resources as funding delays affect national preparation.
Reporting should not be seen merely as an obligation, but as a foundation for land degradation, neutrality, and evidence based decision making.
Bangladesh looks forward to completing in 2026 report on time and working with all partners on the draft decision before this committee.
Thank you, Mr.
Chair.
I thank the representative of Bangladesh.
I give the floor to the representative of Zimbabwe.
Chairperson, distinguished delegates, the government of Zimbabwe supports efforts to improve procedures for communication of information and reporting under the convention, including simplified reporting templates, harmonized indicators, strengthened national reporting systems.
Further, we wish to express our appreciation for the support being provided to parties in the national UNCCD process.
Improved reporting must be met by adequate, predictable and accessible financial and technical support.
Man developing countries face real constraints in data collection.
Monitoring infrastructure, geographic information systems and remote sensing capacity and institutional resources.
Increasing reporting requirements without corresponding means of implementation places an additional burden on parties with limited capacity.
Zimbabwe's own experience, including national land degradation and tract monitoring, environmental statistics, the National Forest Monitoring System, and the National drought monitoring early warning system demonstrates that effective reporting depends on sustained investment in technology, technical expertise and institutional capacity.
In the United Nations Convention combative education reporting should make maximum use of existing national systems.
Government of Zimbabwe therefore encourages the convention to one, Continue providing adequate financial and technical support to developing countries, and secondly, facilitate access to appropriate technologies and a observation tools.
Is a mi chair.
I thank the representative of Zimbabwe.
I give the floor to the representative of Mexico, followed by Cabo Verde and Zambia.
Thank you, Chair.
Mexico recognizes the importance of strength in technical support and national capacity development to improve the quality and consistency of national reports, prioritizing the use of existing national data, information, scientific capacities, and monitoring systems.
We acknowledge the development of these tools.
However, a suggestion will be to consider the ability to incorporate data constructed and validated by the parties.
As, as in our experience for this reporting cycle, products developed in house and validated at national scale, broth results that closely reflect the country's actual situation.
In this sense, it is very important to have access to funding to reinforce national monitoring systems, and to keep engaging the multiple stakeholders beyond this reporting cycle.
This is particularly important for long term outcomes and decision making.
Then future improvements to reporting procedures, methodologies and tools must continue to take into account different national capacities, circumstances, and needs.
Thank you.
I thank the representative of Mexico.
I give the floor to the representative of Cabo verde.
Excuse me.
Misters, please.
Thank you, Chairperson.
President of the CST and President of the Creek.
Good afternoon, distinguished delegates.
Since I'm taking the floor for the first time, allow me to thank the government and people in Mongolia for the warm welcome and the masterful organization of this Cop 17.
I welcome the excellent presentations made on the studies, data, and results on the issue of soil heritage conservation with its implications for all sectors that play a key role in the quality of human life, namely water, plant cover and agricultural production.
The exercises carried out as part of the preparation of national reports for us are seen as important instruments for making an X ray of our natural resources and also represent an opportunity for our human resources to take advantage of these tools in order better to understand, manage, and ensure sustainable management of our natural resources.
However, for K Wert, Given our insularity, the orography of our islands and their geographical location, mapping the vegetation cover is a real challenge.
This means that the new geospatial technologies are an excellent solution for Capo verde, although we are still swimming in a sea of patterns, approaches and strategies which can sometimes leave us confused.
Cappo verde is ready to continue working with the convention and the various partners present here, including the SPC, and the PSLM.
Given their experience with small island states, thank you, Chairperson.
I thank the representative of Cabo Verde.
I give the floor to the representative of Zambia, followed by Dominican Republic and Turkey.
I thank you, Chair.
Mr.
Chair, Distinguished delegates, Zambia wishes to join others in expressing sincere appreciation to the UN CCD Secretariat and its partners in providing support and strengthening national capacities in land cover changes, mapping and reporting through the praise for reporting processes.
We recognize that this support represents a significant step towards the attainment of sustainable land management and the advancement of climate and drought resilience.
Through the praise for tests, Zambia has been able to generate reliable information of decision making, enhance transparency, integrity, coordination, and strengthen national capacity for planning, monitoring and reporting on LDN.
This has further enabled us to better align our national policies and other frameworks with objectives of the convention, while ensuring that communities, youth, policymakers and partners have access to reliable information.
Mr.
Chair, Zambia further wishes to underscore the importance of continued technical and financial support of the provision of high resolution datasets, which will enhance the quality and reliability of reports to foster effective, sustainable land management and socioeconomic development.
We remain committed to working collaboratively with other parties and partners to ensure that the praise for evolves as a robust tool for accountability, knowledge sharing, and the achievement of our collective vision for restoring land and restoring hope.
I thank you, Chair.
I thank the representative of Zambia.
I give the floor to the representative, Dominican Republic.
Thank you, S, and thank you to all the speakers for their presentation.
From our experience with the 2026 reporting process, we believe that reporting should not be seen not only as an obligation, but as a tool for implementation.
Countries report to better understand the condition of their lands, providing information that can help inform ecosystem restoration, biodiversity conservation, and efforts to strengthen resilience.
For the Dominican Republic, the ongoing process has strengthened collaboration among national institutions and sectors, including through national workshops and regional peer to peer exchange.
We also highlight that for this reporting cycle, we have made greater use of national data than in previous cycles, which strengthen national ownership and the relevance of the information generated.
We encourage parties to use the data generated beyond that report to translate this information into concrete actions on the ground.
We thank the Jeff for its financial support, the UCCD Secretariat for its coordination, and FAO and other partners for their technical support throughout the ongoing process.
We also believe that continued access to resources for these processes is important to enable parties to further strengthen their capacities, sustain the progress achieved, and continue improving the quality of future reporting cycles.
Because the true measure of reporting psych process, it's not only the quality of the information we submit, but the change that that information helps us create on the ground.
Thank you.
I thank the representative of the Dominican Republic.
I give the floor to the representative of Turkey, followed by Sudan and Burundi.
Thank you, Chair.
Turkey appreciates the effort of the Secretariat, the regional support hubs, and technical partners in supporting parties through the 2026 reporting process.
Turkey attach particular importance to national ownership and the use of national produced and validated data national expertise in the preparation of national reports.
B national data are available, Turkey prioritize their use.
At the same time, we recognize the important contribution of global datasets and earth observation products, particularly in addressing data gaps and supporting consistency and comparability across parties.
In our view, global datasets should complement rather than replace national data, national expertise, and national monitoring system.
We also believe that the technical support provided through the reporting process should contribute to strengthening long term national capacities.
Access to high resolution data, GS, remote sensing, and other technological tools should therefore be accompanied by capacity building, knowledge transfer, and support for national institutions to generate, validate, and apply these data independently.
In this regard, Turkey welcomes the regional Support Hub approach and encourage continuing technical support that responds to national circumstances and strengths sustainable institutional capacity beyond a single reporting cycle.
Finally, Turkey believes that reporting shouldn't be seen only as an obligation under the convention, but also as an opportunity to strengthen national monitoring, policy development, and the implementation of land degradation notory.
Thank you, Chair.
I thank the representative of Turkey.
I give the floor to the representative of Sudan, followed by Burundi and Burkina Faso.
In the name of God, peace be upon you all.
I would like to thank the chair for providing us this opportunity.
I would like to thank all the centers that gave reports.
Adré droughts, desertification, and land degradation requires stronger international support, particularly when it comes to capacity building, technology transfer and finance, as well as scientific information and the improvement of early detection systems.
Given the circumstances that Sudan is facing, strengthening regional cooperation in Africa is indeed a priority, including making the best use of the regional hubs specialized in droughts, desertification, and remote sensing.
Sudan stresses that support must not be exclusive to reporting.
It should go beyond that to strengthen institutional capacity and data analysis and use of such data in decision making.
Therefore, we call for strengthening technical and financial support to African states, prioritizing the most vulnerable countries.
This support should translate into sustainable country capacities beyond the projects.
Reporting should not be made should not be limited to improving reports, but rather to sustainably analyze data.
We call for enhancing capacities and remote sensing capabilities, as well as the geographical information system.
So that national reports will be improved.
We call for further cooperation with all regional hubs and expertise and further cooperation with other countries in this respect.
Thank you, Mr.
Chair.
I thank the representative of Sudan.
I give the floor to the representative of Burundi.
Hello.
Thank you, Chairperson.
We thank the Secretariat for its organizational efforts for the LDCs.
This is a significant contribution to our national capacities with analysis of data reports and steps to implement the convention.
The 2026 report for this, we thank the Secretariat of the Convention for the efforts made.
As regards progress on the National report, we have made considerable progress collecting data with the support of all of the relevant institutions, and this is an important stage as regards capacity building Burundi believes this is crucial.
It must make it possible to produce and analyze national data and supply them to the convention.
Thus, we call for resources to be made available to strengthen the national team, train it and use the platform, and increase detection capacities.
This is one of the most pressing needs for our country because of the strategic aspects It is crucial to hold specialized training on degraded lands.
Burundi needs to cover the three indicators length organic carbon and so on analyzing the temporary trends and identifying zones and indicators.
We also need follow up for goal three.
We need to strengthen our capacities to work on drought indicator quality to map the risk zones and to include the relevant data.
We must also strengthen capacity to produce data on populations affected by land degradation, poverty, vulnerable coastal zones, and living conditions.
We need a national quality reference mechanism to manage inconsistencies Document sources and conserve metadata, comparing national data to regional ones.
Burndi also needs to create a national database to hold the statistical data, metadata, previous reports.
And information on financing.
Burundi reiterates its commitment to continuously improving the quality of its data and reporting and for the implementation in forming policies to prevent land degradation and build resilience.
Thank you.
I thank the representative of Burundi.
I give the floor to the representative, Burkina Faso, followed by Kuwait.
Madam Madame Lap.
Madam Chair.
Ladies and gentlemen, delegates, Ladies and gentlemen, Burkina affords a great importance to national reporting for CP nine in the framework of the implementation of the convention.
We'd like to report or confirm that this is not just follow up, the reporting that is, it is also a crucial tool in decision making.
It allows for us to measure progress made and identify gaps.
It allows us to better guide policy and investment in fighting desertification, land degradation, and drought Burkina Faso encourages the Secretariat to continue its efforts to ensure that these reporting tools are simple, coherent, and adapted to national capacity, including in Africa.
To the chairs, I say that we commend the efforts made to better bear in mind the existing national data and systems in order to avoid biased results and to reduce the load for the countries.
We call also upon the results of the ninth cycle to be effectively used to improve the implementation of the convention, mobilize financing, and strengthen follow up of the land degradation neutrality goals, as well as the effective implementation of a new framework post 2030.
Burkina Faso reaffirms its willingness to contribute actively to this process and we thank the Secretariat for the support provided to the parties.
I thank you kindly.
I thank the representative, Burkina Faso.
I give the floor to the representative of Kuwait.
The state of Kuwait recognizes that land degradation, desertification, drought, and increasing aridity are closely connected to water, food, environmental security.
As an arid country, Kuwait would like to highlight three priorities.
First, stronger monitoring and early warning systems.
We support the use of satellite imaging, remote sensing, and scientific indicators designed specifically for arid environments.
Second, as integrated approach to land and water security, sustainable land management should be linked with efficient water use.
Kuwait also encourages practical solutions such as treated wastewater and native vegetative for land restoration.
Third, stronger scientific and regional cooperation, and degradation and sand and storms across national borders.
We therefore encourage greater sharing of scientific data, technology, research, and successful practices among countries facing similar challenges.
So Kuwait hopes that the CST here focused on turning scientific knowledge into practical and measurable actions.
Our goal must be to protect the land for future long term environmental security.
Thank you, Chair.
I thank the representative of Kuwait.
I give the floor to the representative of Cook Island.
Thank you, Chair.
And thank you to the UNC CD Secretariat, Global Mechanism, and the panelists.
Thank you, SBC, our Pacific Support Hub for highlighting the realities we face in the Pacific.
The Cook Islands welcomes the report and also acknowledges the Jeff implementing agencies and technical partners whose support has enabled the 2026 reporting process, including the specific workshop we hosted in the Rona Cook Islands.
As highlighted through that workshop and again today, access to appropriate, high resolution data remains important for us.
As a small island developing state, global data sets do not always adequately reflect our national circumstances.
We therefore welcome continued technical support that responds to our national contexts, while strengthening national capacity and ownership so that the benefits are sustained beyond the reporting cycle.
Thank you, Chair.
I thank the representative of Cook Islands.
I give the floor to the representative of the Arab Organization for Agricultural Development.
Thank you all in the room.
The Arab Organization for Agricultural Development, AOAD is a sub regional organization dealing with sustainable agricultural development and food security in the entire Arab countries, the 22 Arab countries.
It is under the League of Arab States.
I would like to flag a persistent problem in our region, the main region, which is the unrest in our region, where seven countries are under protracted unrest and conflict.
This conflict has seriously undermined the limited land restoration effort by the national systems in these countries.
Therefore, there is a huge gap that needs to be filled.
AOAAD as I speak, is doing its best to help the member countries to meet their targets.
We are heavily involved in capacity building, generation of data and reports, as well as the implementation of pilot area projects based on our capacities and the partnership with development partners that has yielded the agencies and organizations on the ground are best positioned to play that role if supported.
We all have the slogan now restoration or restoring land is restoring hope.
With that, thank you very much.
I thank the representative of the Arab Organization for Agricultural Development.
I give the floor to the European Space Agency.
Microphone to the speaker, please.
Distinguished delegates.
The statement is on behalf of the International Committee on Earth Observation satellite CEOs.
Land dereditation, de certification, and draught are among the most pressing challenges facing communities and ecosystems worldwide.
Effective actions present on timely, objective, reliable, and actionable information to support sound decision making and evidence based policies.
Today, Earth observation from satellites provides this capability at unprecedented scale and consistency.
COS representing over 15 members agencies in close collaboration with UNCCD and the GOLDN is committed to supporting countries with the data, tools, standards, and expertise needed to address these challenges.
Through sustainable satellite observation, we can monitor land conditions, detect changes, evaluate restoration outcome, and support evidence based policies.
Earth observation is now a cornerstone for monitoring progress towards land degradation neutrality, supporting reporting against the SDG Indicators 1531.
Harmonized datasets and analysis tools help governments identify areas affected by land degraditation, track the effectiveness of restoration efforts, and determine appropriate further actions.
Satellite data also strengthen ecosystem restoration efforts by supporting planning, monitoring, and tracking recovery.
Looking ahead, CEOs reaffirms our commitment to expand access to Earth observation information, which will strengthen national capacities, improve the monitoring of land degradation neutrality indicators, support restoration commitments, and enhance cooperation across the global environment at By bringing together satellite observations, scientific expertise, technology innovations, and international cooperations, we can help transform Earth observation data into a actionable knowledge into more resilient landscapes, ecosystems, and communities.
Thank you.
I thank the representative of the European Space Agency.
I give the floor to the representative of the United Nations Development Program research agency for the US everything that is related to plan man.
Thank you, Mr.
Chair.
Just a second, please.
UNDP is pleased to update you that through the newly approved Finance medium size project on scaling capacities for LDN, UNDP will utilize methodologies co developed by WCT with country parties to support country's own decision making processes to align and to plan for and implement LDN.
This new project will produce multilingual guidance and training materials for parties, build capacity for parties for LDN and facilitate South South exchange among parties and other stakeholders.
I should note that this project will only support ten countries in hyper countries and sit who have specific needs in monitoring LDN.
I should also note that this support is highly demanded by countries through the expression of interest, we received expression of interest from over 70 countries.
We see significant potential to upgrade this initiative to support many other countries that have specific needs to support LDN monitoring.
Thank you.
I thank the representative of UNDP.
I give the floor to the representative of Civil Society, Woodwell Climate Research Center.
Thank you, Chair.
Distinguished delegates, on behalf of civil society and indigenous peoples, we welcome the efforts to strengthen BRC, improve reporting procedures, enhance data quality and interoperability, and expand capacity building for the 2026 reporting cycle.
Civil Society emphasizes that reporting is not merely a technical exercise.
It is a tool for transparency, accountability, learning, participation, and evidence based decision making.
To be effective, it must reflect the realities and knowledge of those implementing restoration, sustainable land management and drought resilience on the ground.
We therefore highlight seven priorities.
First, reporting must be inclusive and participatory.
CSOs, indigenous peoples, local communities, farmers, pastoralists, women, and youth should participate systematically in national reporting with their contributions reflected in official reports.
Reporting should capture local experiences, innovations, and lessons alongside implementation results.
Second, community generated data must be recognized as valuable evidence.
Community based monitoring, participatory mapping, citizen science, traditional knowledge, and participatory data collection can strengthen national datasets and improve transparency.
Practical mechanisms are needed to integrate this information into reporting.
Third, reporting systems must be accessible and user friendly.
Simplified platforms, multilingual interfaces, accessible digital tools, and guidance adapted to local contexts should facilitate participation rather than create barriers.
Fourth, capacity building must extend beyond national institutions.
Grassroots organizations and communities need support in technical skills, data management, geospatial methods, digital literacy, and participatory monitoring to engage effectively in reporting.
Fifth, transparency and open access are essential.
National reports, datasets, and methodologies should be publicly accessible, accompanied by simplified communication products that make results understandable and useful to wider audiences.
Sixth, reporting must balance scientific rigor with practical realities.
Quantitative indicators should be complemented by qualitative evidence, case studies, and local experiences that capture the social dimensions of restoration, drought resilience, and sustainable land management.
Finally, reporting must be gender responsive and strengthen science policy processes.
This requires sex disaggregated data, gender responsive indicators, and meaningful participation of women, including from indigenous peoples and local communities.
Reporting must measure what is happening on the ground, but it also must help improve what happens on the ground.
We end this intervention by expressing our deep concern over the exclusion of gender, civil society participation and synergies from the CP agenda.
And we urge parties to reinstate these items and ensure meaningful deliberations in line with the text of the convention and previously adopted decisions, recognizing that inclusive participation is essential for effective and transformative implementation of the convention.
Thank you, Chairman.
I thank the representative of Civil Society from the Woodwell Climate Research Center.
We have heard the last speaker on the list.
I now invite the panelists to respond briefly to the questions and comments raised.
In view of time constraints, I request each panelist to limit their response to 2 minutes.
I give the floor to Mr.
Lee.
Lots of the good comments and the insights for the future.
From the roles of the region Support Hub, I think in the future, we would focus on how to improve the data quality and data accessibility and especially for some suggestions to combine with some of the field choose, I think it is very important.
Thank you.
I thank Mr.
Lee.
I give the floor to Mr.
Brink.
Thank you, Mr.
Chair.
Dear colleagues, I listen very carefully to all the very constructive comments you provided.
And I believe we are on the right track as the work we are doing as the support hubs with, of course, the support of the technical advisors.
A lot of good messages in, you know, the work we're doing now, but also in where we should move to in the future.
This shouldn't be just one off, but it should be a continuous process.
Linking the science, linking the Earth's observation with the countries, with the field knowledge.
So we will have follow up work to do certainly as support hubs and technical advisors, and I believe we're happy to take this on.
Thank you.
I thank Mr.
Brink.
I give the floor to Mr.
Kaysera.
Thank you, Chair and quite interesting statements coming from the various countries.
And we want to state that it's clear that technology is no longer the issue, but leverage.
Quite existing efforts from the GEO side and also from the technical side that exist within the national countries.
And so we feel and we think that it's time for us to bring this together to enable us to all have the data that is required to be in.
And so we believe strongly that it's time for us to leverage on the existing efforts, LDN, GeoGLm Geo Bn, CBD, UNF TAC to make sure that we are able to respond to these matters conclusively.
Thank you, Chair.
I thank Mr.
Ksera.
I give the floor to Mr.
Mamuni.
Thank you, Chair.
We heard so many interesting interventions.
Yes, the reporting is very complicated, but it's not only it must not be seen as a burden because The NICE reporting will provide actions.
Until now, the land degradation maps are not yet used for now, but we think that with this collaborative mechanism where from bottom to up the technical advisors, the support hubs, plus the parties and science and technical correspondence, I think that we can do a great job in terms of fine tuning the indicators, unlocking the value of whatever we are reporting because this is the first step to go to impact first, restoration actions, second, and then to unlock the investment.
Thank you.
I thank Mr.
Mamooni.
I give the floor to Mr.
Al Rule.
Thank you.
At the CPC as a supporting hub, we believe what we are doing is more by than just available data or training for reports.
Yes, we need more reliable data, we need to improve quality reports.
We need policy decision action can be taken.
However, also, we see that it's a technical support.
It's a sharing experience, facilitating knowledge sharing, promote connect Institute, corporation, and partnership with countries.
Thanks.
I thank doctor Al Riley.
I give the floor to miss Nessa.
Thank you chair.
The constructive comments from parties and observers are quite welcomed and I heard the strong reinforcement of the value of the regional support hubs, while also highlighting that reporting support must go beyond compliance to strengthen national capacity, improve access to fit for P postosatal and Earth observations data, and ensure that these tools are integrated with local expertise, national datasets, fieldwork, and local community knowledge.
As Pacific community, we look forward to the continued collaboration with the international partners, the UN CAD Secretariat, the technical advisors, and most importantly, with the parties in ensuring that we can address land restoration in a manner that's fit for peoples for countries.
Thank you, Chair.
I thank miss Melissa.
I give the floor to Mr.
Francis.
Thank you, Chair.
At PSLM we believe and listening to all of the parties that made their interventions.
Co production really is the central team of what would deliver on the reporting process and also deliver on for capacity building and use of the data among all the conventions.
And the central tendency really here is to ensure that participation in the process would ensure that there is adequate delivery.
So when there is co production, national ownership increases, the reporting quality improves, you know, the capacity is sustained and the reporting system remains within the country.
And PS Selmer is geared towards encouraging that sort of thought process and movement throughout the convention.
Thank you, Chair.
I thank Mr.
Francis.
I thank all the panelists for their contributions.
I also thank parties and observers for their valuable interventions.
Distinguished delegates, in order to prepare a draft decision for this agenda item, the CRC chair and I propose that a joint CRC CST contact group be established in line with past practice.
It is my understanding that the facilitators designated for the respective committees will co facilitate the joint contact group.
May I take it that the committees wish to establish the joint CRC CST contact group and to appoint the designated facilitators as co facilitators.
I hear no objection.
It is so decided.
Please be advised that the first meeting of the joint contact group will take place at 6:00 P.M.
Today immediately after the adjournment of this meeting in Room MET 12.
Following the conclusion of the joint contact group meeting, the CRC contact group will meet in Room Met 12 and the CST contact group will meet in MET 13.
We have thus concluded this stage of the joint consideration of the agenda item entitled Improving Procedures for the communication of information, as well as the quality and formats of reports to be submitted to the conference of the parties.
Before adjourning the meeting, I wish to remind participants that the committee on Science and Technology will hold its fifth and final plenary meeting on Friday, 21st of August at 3:00 P.M.
In the plenaryll.
The committee for the review of the implementation of the convention will hold its sixth plenary meeting on Friday, the 21st of August at 3:00 P.M.
In the main committee room.
The joint meeting is adjourned.